Fingerprint readers are the latest technology that is making its way into laptops. They are becoming more and more common, with some models already including them as standard. Here are the top five best laptops with fingerprint readers in 2024.
The hp laptops with fingerprint security are the 5 best laptops that have fingerprint readers. These laptops are recommended for people who want to keep their data secure.
Microsoft’s current Windows 10 operating system now includes a complete biometric recognition capability in the form of Windows Hello. As a result, you may use facial recognition to log on to compatible computers. An internal system login via fingerprint is also provided. In a few of seconds, you’ll be on the Windows desktop. In this article, we’ll show you the Best Laptops with Fingerprint Sensor in 2024 that we evaluated.
Lenovo Thinkpad P1 Gen 2 is ranked first
- Outstanding performance
- Fans who remain silent
- Fantastic Display
The casing is extremely nicely made, as is usual of the Thinkpad series! When closed, the gadget is 2.3 cm thick at its thickest point. The height of the wrist rest is 2 cm. When you open the case, the big touchpad is the first thing that strikes your attention. On the right of the wrist-rest is the glossy black Thinkpad logo. On the right side, there is a fingerprint reader. The touchpad isn’t perfectly aligned. It measures 11.5 centimeters on the left and 14.5 centimeters on the right. However, this should not cause any further issues with the function. I observed that fingerprints are easily visible on the casing, the wrist rest, and the touchpad.
Trackpad and Keyboard
The P1 is a 6-row precision keyboard without a number pad, much as its predecessor and sister devices. The keyboard on the model we tested includes a backlight, which can be adjusted in two stages using the FN + space bar, as is customary. Many keys include an extra LED that shows the state of the function.
The start button is placed above the “end” key in the bezel and is not part of the keyboard. Here, a white LED shows that the device is operational. It can be written quite comfortably on the keyboard, exactly as on my previously tested T490s and T495s! It also varies only slightly from the predecessors’ exterior structure, which is utilized in the T430 and other models, so there is no need to get accustomed to it. Another benefit is the stroke of the keyboard. It stays silent even when you write extremely quickly. This is particularly useful when students use the laptop in lectures or the library, for example.
The trackpoint is well-implemented, as one would expect from Lenovo. As previously stated, the touchpad is 7 cm high and 10 cm broad, leaving plenty of space for scrolling. Normal and multi-touch inputs are successfully recognized. Double tapping on the touchpad or in the bottom left region may be used to perform left clicks. Only the press stays in the correct place for the right click.
Display
The P1 is equipped with a Full-HD HDR 400 IPS (1920 x 1080) 500 nits, 1200:1 contrast, 72 percent NTSC, and 170° viewing angle display. The panel that was fitted is an Innolux N156HCE-GN1! It does not have a touchscreen. It boasts vibrant colors and I was sold by the viewing angle stability! From a semicircle, all participants in a five-person conference could view the videos well. I can only provide a subjective assessment since I was unable to test the brightness here as well. This is what it is: The colors and contrasts of the Innolux N156HCE-GN1 are excellent. It was very enjoyable to edit videos on it. In terms of color display, I currently suggest the Innolux for graphics and/or video editing. In any case, it can compete with the AUO panels and, in my view, is appropriate for the job described above. It also passed the test in the open air. However, you should avoid direct sunlight in this area, since the image may look “milky.” It is appropriate for work in the shade (e.g. beneath a parasol) in any situation!
Performance
The test equipment is equipped with an Intel Core i7-9750H HexaCore 2.6-4.5 GHz, 12 MB SmartCache, 45W TDP, and the NVIDIA® Quadro® T1000 4GB GDRR5 128bit.
In the Cinebench R20 test, the P1 scored an average of 1960 points in mains operation. 2095 points was the highest measured number, while 1825 points was the lowest. Both tests were performed at maximum strength. The clock rate was between 3.0 and 4.0 GHz at the commencement of the application. When rendering video projects, all cores/threads operated at an average of 2.4 GHz. In the graphical test Geeks3D FurMark, Nvidia scored 2102 points (35 frames per second) (35 FPS). The graphics card uses its own memory to store the RAM (4 GB). With the Nvidia, you’ll have ample buffer for visual programs, CAD software, and more demanding games.
The test device includes a 512 GB M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD Opal2 M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD! The SSD should have adequate storage capacity and be fast enough to handle a variety of applications.
Fans
There are two fans on the P1! One for the CPU and the other for the GPU! In office mode, you may work passively cooled (i.e. quietly) despite the P1’s performance. You’ll see the waste heat on the keyboard and above the keyboard more clearly if it’s needed (e.g. the Cinebench test or video projects). The whole top half of the keyboard, along with the keyboard itself, is most likely used for heat dissipation. In both battery and mains operation, the CPU oscillates in balanced mode at about 9-10 watts. The fan is either not audible at all or just infrequently in certain regions. When a video, for example, is produced, the fan is heard clearly and loudly. Here’s a video showing the casing with recording devices on the sides.
Battery
The battery is an 80Wh Li-ion battery with up to 13 hours of runtime and RapidCharge: 80 percent in 1 hour, according to the design.
The P1 receives 135 watts from the adaptor, which weighs 324 grams. If you recall the W520/W530 era’s “debris,” you’ll recognize the adapter as a “slim version.”
Conclusion
I used the P1 with the program at work.
- Adobe Audition, Adobe Audition, Adobe Audition, Adobe Audition
- Using After Effects
- Photoshop
- Premiere
It’s a mathematician who has more than satisfied all of my requirements at work! I used the P1 to cut two large projects (containing 4K material) and there was still air in the cut. There are worlds in between my most recent Thinkpads, which are a W520 and T430 (Intel) in full development. In video editing, the P1, tailored to the appropriate performance needs, held its own even in battery mode. With the 500 nits, it may also be used outdoors or in bright workplaces in the summer. In the field, for example, I used the P1 to edit a movie.
In pure office mode (Word, Excel, view PDFs, surf), the battery shows 4:01 hours and is completely charged. The power use is 9.7 watts. The display, for example, oscillates about 2 hours if movies are modified (no stretching). A 1:30 minute movie rendering (which took 27 minutes) consumed up half of the battery in battery mode.
I keep my laptop with me throughout classes since I’m still studying on the side. The considerations of space (size) and battery life are critical here. Because of the course of education, computing power is in lower demand. Because of its flat form, the P1 fits easily into a backpack or bag and doesn’t take up much room. It does, however, take up a lot more room in lectures and is difficult to use with a writing pad. After all, it’s a 15.6-inch screen! However, if you just take notes on your laptop, it will fit on the student’s bench. However, using the P1 there is clearly overkill for my course of study! PDFs, online research, and video viewing are the only prerequisites! Nonetheless, with the proper battery settings, I was able to get the most out of its runtime and work/play for about 200 minutes.
When it comes to performance, 4K movies, CAD programs, or just a long-term investment in a powerful laptop, the P1 is a must-have. As a result, applications that need a lot of CPU and GPU power may be run without hesitation on the P1, making it the winner of our Best Laptops with Scanner for fingerprints Ranking!
Lenovo E495 is ranked second
- Work at a rapid pace
- Battery that works well
- Keyboard that is easy to use
The Thinkpad E495 comes in a traditional red-black color scheme, which is unsurprising. This time, a red sticker was placed in the bottom left corner, which looks much better than the prior blue sticker. Lenovo has made a really nice move at this stage.
The casing is entirely constructed of plastic, with the case itself being made of a matt, rough-textured substance and the lid being made of a smoother, somewhat shinier material. Unfortunately, the traditional rubber covering is absent at this time.
Nothing creaks, squeaks, or rattles, which makes for a great first impression. At all times, the bottom shell is rigid and not particularly flexible.
The long black hinge employed at this point is unobtrusive – it can be opened with one hand, keeps the last set position at all times, and does not swing even while typing in a sweeping motion.
Ports
The Thinkpad E495, like virtually other contemporary laptops, has a limited amount of ports and expansion possibilities. On the left of the charging socket, we have an HDMI port, two USB ports, and a combined audio port (USB-C).
On the right side, you’ll find another USB port, a full-size RJ45 network connection, a Kensington lock, and a micro SD card slot.
There are no connections between the front and rear, which is unfortunate. A docking port is no longer accessible; instead, use this link to find a USB-C docking option.
Keyboard
In terms of the casing, the keyboard seems to be identical to that of the other Thinkpads. Unfortunately, this model lacks keyboard lighting; just a few keys (CapsLock, ESC/FnLock, and audio/micro lock key) have a status LED.
The chiclet keyboard has a nice typing feel to it; there is little flex and the keys react quickly. Even quick typers should have no trouble with this.
The trackpad is also impervious to criticism. It’s a little harsher than other gadgets, but it responds consistently. The main drawback is that it takes almost a centimeter for it to detect a finger reaching in from the outside. This may be due to the trackpad’s 1mm lower position in respect to the casing, which makes wiping motions harder. The clickability in the bottom region is excellent and smooth; but, owing to the lever movement, it is more difficult in the top area.
The trackpoint with dedicated buttons works well, as it always does.
Display
In terms of the casing, the keyboard seems to be identical to that of the other Thinkpads. Unfortunately, this model lacks keyboard lighting; just a few keys (CapsLock, ESC/FnLock, and audio/micro lock key) have a status LED.
The chiclet keyboard has a nice typing feel to it; there is little flex and the keys react quickly. Even quick typers should have no trouble with this.
The trackpad is also impervious to criticism. It’s a little harsher than other gadgets, but it responds consistently. The main drawback is that it takes almost a centimeter for it to detect a finger reaching in from the outside. This may be due to the trackpad’s 1mm lower position in respect to the casing, which makes wiping motions harder. The clickability in the bottom region is excellent and smooth; but, owing to the lever movement, it is more difficult in the top area.
The trackpoint with dedicated buttons works well, as it always does.
What about the output now that we’re satisfied with the data input?
As a monitor, we have a 14-inch IPS display with a 16:9 aspect ratio and 1920×1080 pixels. This has a brightness of 250nits and is said to have a contrast of 600:1 as well as an extremely low viewing angle of 170°.
So, none of these figures point to a very impressive performance. This is also true in practice. The display is ideally suited for office settings, since the minimum brightness can be adjusted extremely low, and the contrast can be tolerated even at low levels. Even at extreme angles, the lighting is consistent, and the display does not invert. In muted mode, I didn’t see any flashing or beeping.
If you intend to work outdoors, the display will be too dark and the contrast will be insufficient owing to the somewhat reflecting surface.
The contrast and color rendering are adequate for modest needs, however it lacks brightness and color space when compared to superior displays. However, when compared to earlier TN screens such as the T410 (which the elder among us will remember), the display is excellent. However, I wouldn’t like to perform picture editing with more demanding requirements.
The speakers on the bottom of the Thinkpad E495 provide the sound. Depending on the surface, this works nicely combined. Unfortunately, at medium and high volumes, the speakers clatter. The loudness is quite high and adequate for sound reinforcement in an office setting.
Display
The E495 is likewise built on the assumption that maintenance flaps are a thing of the past. The one-piece bottom shell can be removed in one piece with a lot of time and caution after removing a handful of screws, providing a view of virtually every functional component in the E495.
The two accessible memory slots, of which only one is filled with an 8GB bar, provide for a good first impression. DualChannel benefits Ryzen CPUs significantly, thus upgrading to 2x8GB would be strongly advised. Hynik’s 256GB NVMe-SSD is installed in one of the two M.2 slots (the second one is occupied by the WLAN card 9260 from Intel). To the best of my knowledge, I also named the 2.5-inch dummy that came with it. There is no need to purchase a connecting kit since an existing hard drive may be inserted right away.
All other components, such as the ventilation system, the batteries, and the hinges, are readily accessible. As a result, removing the mainboard from the carrier should never be required (many thanks to HP…)
Apart from the bottom shell’s sensitive plastic clamps, this is a very excellent rating since there are no soldered components that make upgrading or conversion difficult.
Performance
Now that we’ve seen and approved of the outside, we’ve arrived at the most fascinating part: the inside.
This E model, unlike the others in the series, features an AMD CPU. This isn’t a new concept at Lenovo – there have previously been series with similar CPUs – but AMD has lately done a lot of things right with the Ryzen series. Let’s check whether this applies to mobile CPUs as well. The AMD Ryzen 3500U CPU in the E495 in question is rated to run at 2.1-3.7 GHz depending on load, temperature, and the number of cores needed. It has 15 watts of TDP available for this purpose.
Under inspection, the Ryzen 3500U takes full use of its available capacity, clocking at 1.33 GHz in idle mode and 3.72 GHz under load. This is true in battery mode as well; however, it seems to clock up less aggressively there, resulting in somewhat lower performance numbers.
Under PCMark10, the 3500U receives 3418 points for mains operation, with 2728 points remaining in battery mode. I’d like to start by saying that DualChannel is well worth your time. With 2x8GB, the PCMark10 result rises to a total of 3861 points, a 13 percent gain.
A fast CPU, as is widely known, requires a strong cooling system. This, like other non-workstation variants, is restricted by size, which in many instances restricts the processor’s maximum performance. Fortunately, this is true in theory in this instance, although no complex throttle orgies a la 800 MHz are present.
The cooling system in general: The fan rotates between 0 rpm and approximately 60°C (allowing for mainly passive cooling), then begins at an audible 3300 rpm and rises to a maximum of 4700 rpm (clearly audible). This number of revolutions is seldom achieved with computationally demanding activities or graphics-intensive operations, although it may be accomplished with regular usage, such as rendering.
The CPU slows down at 80°C, and it hasn’t been much higher than 84°C for me. It maintains a constant clock rate of 2900-3050MHz on all cores at this temperature for extended periods of time (h264/h265 encoding in handbrake). Higher clock speeds are definitely feasible at more suitable temps, since I presently have a 30°C room temperature. Because the exhaust air is directed downhill, a “jacking up” may be beneficial.
Wasn’t there anything else – well, yeah, the coffee? As you can see, a temperature of 84°C would be adequate for drinking. However, brewing at these temperatures is not recommended; instead, utilize Intel processors, which can achieve temperatures of up to 100°C. However, in normal functioning, the coffee is just lukewarm – 44-56°C. As a result, the E495 is unsuitable for brewing coffee, but it is ideal for keeping it warm.
The Lenovo E495 only includes the Vega 8 expansion stage, which is the smallest of the Vega graphics cards. Nonetheless, this is a pretty excellent image – literally – for a graphics card embedded inside the CPU.
It puts itself well ahead of the Intel 620, and even the T480s’ MX150 (3551 points) has to concede defeat. The MX150 from the T480s, on the other hand, may benefit from the improved cooling performance and maintains its lead with 4300 points. Regardless, both are dedicated graphics cards with all of their benefits and drawbacks. If you need more performance from your integrated graphics card, the Vega 10 is the way to go.
It’s OK for a game in between, but it can’t handle the latest titles or FullHD details. However, for an office laptop, the performance is outstanding. It’s worth noting that the Vega 8’s full performance is only achieved in Dual Channel mode – after all, there’s a 23 percent boost in performance. The second 8GB bar is a must-have in my opinion.
Battery
The inbuilt battery has a capacity of 45Wh and can be changed with some effort – but not while driving. There is no external battery, unlike the T-models, thus the built-in battery is the sole source of power.
The E495 gets 11 hours and 10 minutes of battery life with the lowest brightness, an active browser, and different windows that aren’t loaded, according to Windows (CPU Package Power 0.73W). Under full load, this number decreases to under 90 minutes (11.1W package power, 3.12 GHz on all cores). At fluctuating load, 5-7 hours is a reasonable estimate.
Conclusion
Is the E495 something I’d recommend? Absolutely. The Ryzen 3500U performs well versus Intel’s competitors, and its battery life is similar. The cooling system effortlessly controls the performance – the 2.1 GHz base clock is consistently surpassed. What more could you ask for? The visuals are on par with specialized graphics cards.
You’ll have to forego certain features (SSD, rubberized lid), but the E495 excels in terms of expandability (apart from the lack of LTE), such as the second Ram bar. The craftsmanship is flawless, and the materials are reasonable for the price. Overall, we strongly advise you to get our Best Price in the Best Laptops with Fingerprint Scanner Ranking.
Dell Precision 5540 is ranked third
- Work at a rapid pace
- Stunning Display
- a strong case
- There is just one Thunderbolt-3 port.
Professionally on the go. The Dell Precision 5540 is the Dell XPS 15’s workstation version. Aside from a nearly similar appearance, the internal components are what distinguishes the two vehicles.
The XPS series’ “case,” which has been in use for many generations, is so perfectly done that Dell not only utilizes it for years, but also across all classes. It should satisfy the needs of professional users, like the Dell Precision 5540 does, and it mainly offers adequate selectivity with Nvidia Quadro graphics. In addition, an Intel Xeon CPU is offered, which is designed to improve dependability in constant load situations.
The Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen.2, the HP ZBook Studio G5, the HP ZBook 15v, and Apple’s 15-inch MacBook Pro are all possible rivals with a comparable orientation.
Design
The Dell Precision 5540’s chassis is well crafted, has a high torsional rigidity, and exudes a high level of overall quality. Despite the lack of an aluminum unibody shell, Dell manages to create a very attractive chassis using a mix of metal, plastic, and carbon fiber composite. In a workstation comparison, the test weight with a 97 Wh battery is a modest 4.4 lbs and may be characterized as delightfully light. The Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen.2 with a weight of 3.7 lbs, for example, is even lighter with a similar casing quality and only has an 80 Wh battery included.
The whole base plate of the Dell Precision 5540 must be removed before the case can be opened. There hasn’t always been a separate maintenance lid on the Dell-XPS-15 chassis. As a stopgap, you may use the service manual for the Dell Precision 5530: Dell Precision 5530 Service Manual to figure out how to access, replace, or insert the various components. At the time of testing, Dell’s support website did not provide an update for the Precision 5540.
Ports
Since the Dell Precision 5510, Dell has clearly made no changes to the interface equipment. With the professional sector, a single Thunderbolt 3 port should be a little tight, as it was in the Dell Precision 5530. Dell could have simply added a second Thunderbolt 3 port to one of the two USB type-A connectors.
External UHD monitors may also be used with a frame rate of 60 Hz through the Thunderbolt 3’s integrated DisplayPort, thanks to HDMI 2.0. Fast UHS-II cards are not slowed by the memory card reader.
The Dell Precision 5540’s interface performance is excellent, as it was with its predecessor. Data may be transmitted at speeds of up to 423 MB/s using USB 3.0 and up to 268 MB/s using a memory card reader.
There are currently a variety of strong and reasonably priced mass storage devices available to fully use the Thunderbolt 3’s capabilities. The Samsung Portable SSD X5, for example, can read at up to 2,151 MB/s and write at up to 595 MB/s.
Fingerprint Scanner
The Dell Precision 5540, like the Dell Precision 5530, has a fingerprint reader. This is readily accessible and incorporated into the on/off button. Dell doesn’t usually provide a smartcard reader with the series. Otherwise, different Computrace services or Opal-compliant solid state devices may be used to augment the standard BIOS and system password backups. There is always a Trusted Platform Module on board. For physical security, a Noble cable lock preparation is offered.
Sound
The dual speakers built on the lower front side provide a sound that is well balanced. The bass is present, and the mids are well discernible. Even with this approach, a certain treble load is unavoidable. The maximum volume of 78.5 dB(A) is not only low, but it also does not distort.
External speaker systems may be simply linked through USB or Bluetooth, extending the range and clarity of presentations and video nights. The 3.5 mm jack connection is on the left side of the enclosure and connects the headphone and microphone outputs.
Touchpad and Keyboard
Despite the big 15-inch casing, the Dell Precision 5540’s keyboard lacks a separate number pad. Number jugglers won’t enjoy it, but it does provide a unified look with the touchpad in the center. The keys are standard size since they are placed in a 19 mm grid.
Only the arrow keys seem to be squeezed, as is customary. The vertical orientation, in particular, might have been a little more opulent. You don’t have to worry about any unpleasant shocks when it comes to important assignments. The writing is high-contrast, and the two-stage keyboard lighting may be used to accentuate it if required.
In typing mode, the keyboard’s quality makes a strong impact. The brief stroke provides a nice pressure point, a pleasing stroke noise, and benefits from the keyboard mat’s secure placement. Nothing is on the verge of falling apart here.
Although the touchpad doesn’t quite match the size of a 15-inch MacBook Pro, it still provides plenty of room with a 105 x 80 mm input area. Multiple finger motions, as well as simpler input, are consistently acknowledged. The gliding qualities are excellent, and the haptics are pleasing. The mouse keys incorporated into the touchpad operate well and are not a source of complaint. In the Dell Precision 5540, however, you will be lacking a trackpoint.
Display
With Dell Precision 5540, the UHD OLED display utilized in the test device features a smooth display surface and a respectably performing anti-reflective coating. In contrast to many competitors, it is able to significantly decrease the amount of reflections that occur. However, there are certain limitations to consider here, which may be distracting depending on the screen orientation and lighting circumstances.
The OLED version does not allow for finger manipulation. You must use the UHD IGZO4 monitor as an alternative if you value this input option. Samsung supplied the screen for the test device, which impresses with its overall viewing angle stability. In the usual test sequence, with the screen filling white in the middle, the maximum brightness hits 436 cd/m2. Because OLEDs can adjust their power usage and brightness based on their surroundings, they were able to reach up to 534 cd/m2 in the test with tiny white patches.
The lighting of full-screen white tends to achieve an average of 86 percent from a metrological standpoint. The dark picture, on the other hand, shows no changes since the OLEDs do not produce any light. As a result, black picture material is shown without any brightening, cloud formation, or halos at the display’s boundaries. A greenish-red color shimmer occurs in bright picture material depending on the viewing angle from the side or from above. This isn’t bothersome, but it’s something to think about if you have a sensitive screen.
The brightness may be changed in 11 levels as a percentage or in the display settings, as normal. Level 6 has a brightness of 147 cd/m2 and level 7 has a brightness of 205 cd/m2 (both display center, full white). The panel’s high brightness, outstanding contrast, and bluish-green anti-reflective coating make it ideal for outdoor usage. Direct sunlight or poor viewing angles, on the other hand, should be avoided.
Performance
Despite the small housing dimensions and therefore suboptimal cooling circumstances, performance development is fairly consistent with a continuously maintained CPU load. All Intel CPUs tested so far have been clearly outperformed, with a consistent 23,600 points. Only AMD’s Ryzen 7 1700 benefits from the Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC’s superior cooling and comes out on top in this scenario.
Under simultaneous CPU and GPU stress, Dell prioritizes the best possible graphics performance. The Nvidia Quadro T2000 has a core clock rate of 1.5 to 1.54 GHz, while the processor clock rate varies between 1.8 and 2.1 GHz. In this full load situation, the average CPU geeking result is lowered to about 13,000 points, a loss of almost 10,000 points.
The graphics unit intended for professional activities is the most important component of a mobile workstation. Here, special OpenGL-optimized drivers, a customized BIOS, and changed hardware are utilized. The professional graphics processors should outperform the typical consumer graphics units from the Geforce and Radeon series, particularly in continuous load operation and OpenGL-optimized professional programs from the CAD industry.
The tested Dell Precision 5540 has a Quadro T2000 Turing graphics card with 4 GB GDDR5 graphics RAM. In the Nvidia Optimus network, it works with the integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630. By switching between the graphics chips, you may use either the strong professional graphics or the very cost-effective processor graphics. This is particularly helpful for battery life in mobile devices.
The Nvidia Quadro T2000 is designed for laptops with a screen size of 15 inches or bigger. In the test device, it features 1,024 shader units, 4 GB of GDDR5 graphics memory (Micron), and a clock rate of up to 1,605 MHz. The power usage, according to Nvidia, could be somewhere between 40 and 60 watts.
Battery
The tester is equipped with a big 97-Wh battery, which is required for OLED panel setups. This then completely occupies the available space in the housing, leaving no place for a 2.5-inch mass memory. If the OLED display is not required, the Dell Precision 5540 may be configured with a 56 Wh battery and 2.5 inch hard drive.
Because of the large battery capacity, the test gadget obtains excellent battery runtimes under real-world circumstances. The PCMark 8 battery test (205 cd/m2, balanced profile, wifi on) takes 3:56 hours to complete, while the PCMark 10 Modern Office Battery Test takes 9:07 hours to complete. The battery takes 164 minutes to charge using the 130 watt adaptor.
In battery mode, the Dell Precision 5540 delivers excellent results. Over 90% of the real performance is always accessible in mains operation in the evaluated situations. This comes at the cost of the battery life that may be achieved, but it results in great performance in computationally demanding tasks.
Conclusion
In the current model year, the Dell Precision 5540 mobile workstation also manages to lift the bar a little higher. The upgrades that come with it clearly differentiate the Precision 5540 from its predecessor and should be a compelling reason to consider upgrading.
Above all, there’s performance, display quality, and noise emissions to consider. The camera, which is now back in the top display frame, is also a nice addition. The quality of the casing and manufacture, as well as the interface equipment, configuration choices, and input devices, has remained excellent.
In most instances, smaller building sites, such as the lack of a WWAN option or a second Thunderbolt 3 connection, may be overcome. Whether this also applies to the somewhat too weakly dimensioned power supply and the, even after profiling, not quite perfect color fidelity, depends a lot on the planned area of application and personal needs.
5540 Dell Precision In the end, the Dell Precision 5540 workstation performs well and should persuade a large number of potential customers of its benefits.
HP ZBOOK 17 G6 is ranked fourth
- Work at a rapid pace
- Keyboard that is easy to use
- Case that is safe
In the comparative test, HP’s ZBook 17 G6 came in fourth position. The laptop, which weighs nearly 7.2 pounds and features a 17-inch display, but only in Full-HD quality, as the name suggests.
The brightness is just average at 339 cd/m2, and it goes down sharply at the corners, so there are better displays than this one overall.
The superb keyboard and craftsmanship, on the other hand, are two of the notebook’s strong points. Nothing is shaky here, and everything seems to be sturdy and long-lasting.
When you open the maintenance flap on the case’s bottom, you’ll see a lot of empty space, which is meant for simple retrofitting with an SSD or more RAM.
While the ZBook’s display seemed a little shaky, its performance was impressive. The considerably less expensive ZBook couldn’t compete with the P1, but it was constantly ahead of the pack in the chase.
The device’s excellent rendering value stands out, and it was also lightning quick when it came to picture editing. Last but not least, the ZBook came up on top in the gaming benchmark, which should satisfy serious screen workers who are gamers.
Our test device, which is ISV-certified for most apps, came with an NFC chip as an added bonus.
Conclusion
The ZBook impresses with its performance as well as its long battery life. Thanks to the maintenance flap, installing extra hardware is a breeze. Despite being behind the other three devices, the HP ZBook is an excellent business laptop with a fingerprint scanner that I would highly suggest!
Dell Latitude 14 7400 is ranked fifth
- Work at a rapid pace
- Several Ports
- Touchscreen
- The brightness of the display is insufficient.
Unlike the XPS series, which is targeted at both private and corporate customers, the Latitude 7400 2-in-1 is entirely focused on the requirements of business users. This may be observed, for example, in the presence of a service hatch and components such as the SSD replacement, which are not soldered but will be plugged in. In addition, there’s a broader support and service package available, as well as extra security measures. In this respect, the Latitude 7400 2-in-1 is a completely unique, luxurious delicacy with: TPM module, Noble lock slot, and different security software, the Business-Convertible for the first time over a proximity sensor. This immediately prevents access to the computer if its owner is present, and reports him using facial recognition, as well as instantly restarts when the device is connected again – without requiring him to input a password or the…for fingerprints.
Also on the topic of productivity, the time exposure latitude moves: Great input devices, four fast USB ports (two of which support Thunderbolt 3), several Docking choices, and a built-in LTE modem make work easier in the office and on the go. Furthermore, even on the longest business trip, the ultra-slim business bolides hardly run out of juice: Because the battery may last nearly 15 hours with normal Office activities. Despite the fact that our test device only has a Core i5 CPU, it receives a full score in the test area System performance.
And, since the magnificent convertible isn’t completely devoid of beauty and craftsmanship, it towers above the flexible mobile computer, putting the brand’s XP13 at the top of the connect best list – despite the fact that the gadget is, at least in the tested configuration, recklessly pointing: This is how the SSD is only 256 GB, even though the display brightness allows for certain desires to be fulfilled, and an active Pen is only accessible for a fee. Nonetheless, we give the Latitude 7400 2-in-1 a strong recommendation to purchase – if the price allows, especially for home users.
How to Use Windows Hello’s Fingerprint Sensor
Users of business notebooks will, of course, exclaim, “Unlock by fingerprint?” It’s been around for a long time!” Of course, this is correct: More than 10 years ago, my first Thinkpad featured a fingerprint sensor that protected not just Windows, but also the whole notebook if requested. However, Microsoft has officially incorporated Windows Hello into the system, eliminating the requirement for third-party applications. The solution works far better than anything I’ve tested so far on the Xiaomi Notebook Air (learn more about the device here), where I utilize Windows Hello in this guide.
Maybe I’m simply forgetting about recent comparisons, but if your laptop is Hello-ready, you should give it a go. On the Microsoft site, you can learn more about Windows Hello and see which devices are already supported. You may also improve your Windows Hello compatibility by following these steps: Appropriate gadgets connect to your desktop PC through USB to provide comfort features.
And here’s how to set up Windows Hello on your Windows 10 computer:
- To begin, go to the Start menu and choose Settings. Here you go to Accounts and then to the Login Options submenu.
- If your PC or laptop satisfies the Windows Hello criteria, click Setup under Fingerprint to get started. You must first enter the current PIN number or password for your Windows installation before Windows will accept your fingerprint.
- Windows 10 now prompts you to configure your fingerprint. You’ll be able to log into the operating system in no time using this fingerprint. To register your fingerprint, just follow the instructions on the screen. It may require a little patience depending on the hardware you’re using, but in my experience, the identification works flawlessly in practice.
- If Windows 10 is pleased with your finger, you may still enroll more fingers for enrollment. When you’re finished, just “Lay Finger” into your Windows installation to log in. Alternatively, you may use the conventional password or PIN to log in. By the way, you may opt to log in fully automatically as well. This guide will demonstrate how to do this.
What are your thoughts on Windows Hello? Is this a useful feature, or do you cringe at the prospect of surrendering your fingerprint to Windows 10? I eagerly await your feedback and debates.
The dell fingerprint laptop list is a list of 5 laptops with fingerprint readers.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is the best laptop with fingerprint?
This is a really difficult question to answer. There are so many different types of laptops with fingerprint scanners, and some are better than others. However, the best laptop for you might be one that has an SSD hard drive, 8 GB RAM, and a dedicated graphics card.
Does laptop have fingerprint scanner?
Yes, laptop has fingerprint scanner.
Which Lenovo laptop have fingerprint?
There are a variety of Lenovo laptops that have fingerprint scanners.
